Bad science is a pejorative term used by individuals to discredit efforts of concerned individuals to protect the brains of children in WIFI zones.
While it is known that WIFI symptoms do not appear in the majority of people, I have witnessed them in people and experienced symptoms myself.
Perhaps, second hand smoke is bad science and yet so many died from it. Polluters often pollute the minds of those needing greatest protection.
WIFI EMF radiation damage is like ultraviolet light that we all can tolerate to more or less degree.
To deny its existence is nonsense science worse than bad science?
The problem occurs when people lose their rights to an I polluted environment, so the issue is really about political choice which is why bad-science-watch people thrive despite serious injury to some individuals.
Man made pollution is NOT acceptable as a sustainable strategy because it reduces the future range of potentials for sound development! It is nevertheless a policy that is increasingly acceptable to some Canadians who want to move faster and push aggressive agendas for development along paths of riskier choices.
