Scratches to Sketches
Thursday 7 July 2011
Police corruption and phone hacking penalties - Google Search
Who kidnapped Muriel McKay in Wimbledon in 1969?
General!
Rupert Murdoch connection?
http://www.crimeandinvestigation.co.uk/crime-files/mckay-kidnapping/crime.html
Muriel McKay mistaken for Anna Murdoch, Rupert's wife!
http://www.crimeandinvestigation.co.uk/crime-files/mckay-kidnapping/crime.html
http://www.search.co.tt/trinidad/hoseinbrothers/index.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Rawlinson,_Baron_Rawlinson_of_Ewell
My memory is that in 1969, there was a kidnapping/murder in Wimbledon associated with Mr Alick McKay, the Deputy Chairman of the News of the World
As a young man, I was interviewed by police after the kidnapping/murder in Wimbledon! News of World was shaken by this kidnapping/murder!
Burglary at home of Alick McKay of the News of the World!!!!!
Muriel McKay was missing? Mystery? No one knows what happened to her!
Murder without a body?
http://www.yourdiscovery.com/web/crime-museum-uk/episode-guide/vanishing-victims/
Smoking gun?
http://century.guardian.co.uk/1960-1969/Story/0,,106506,00.html
http://www.magforum.com/notprivateeye.htm
Maxwell claimed 'war of jungle' effort by Murdoch against him! What did he really mean?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Maxwell
Why are people terrified of the Murdoch family?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupert_Murdoch
Murdoch outsmarted Maxwell the same year 1969 to take over News of the World.
Any connection? Would you do the forensic research?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_of_the_World
Murdoch lived where in 1969 or near that time? Wimbledon?
News of the World ... You are Fired! Murdoch and Rebekah you both should be arrested!
Why? What bothers you now?
We need arrests now! Yours?
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=murdoch+hacking+scandal&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&client=safari
news of world to close down - Google Search
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=news+of+world+to+close+down&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&client=safari
What is legal in hacking?
Why not!
It should be because there is intent to break the law! It's like the collecting of photos by pedophiles!
Hackers should be listed like pedophiles and restrictions placed on their ownership and use of electronic devices.
Your name and details could be secretly sold or collected and that should be illegal.
That is serious stuff!
Having such private information should be considered criminal! Being singled out for hacking should be seen as criminal!
Baroness RAWLINGS Misses the Point About the Phone Hackings and Murdoch's Negative Influence
In viewing debate in the House of Lords, we observe The Baroness Rawlings state that she and the government are bound by the rule of law.
She does not see how deep the corruption is presently seated.
It is like a severe pneumonia killing of democratic institutions.
The British tools of law enforcement were found glaringly wanting, and without law there will be a wave of discontent that could pull us close to a fascist state where a rule of law dictated by individuals rather than government prevail. The rapid rise of Herr Himmler and Herr Hitler in Germany during the 1930's comes to mind. They controlled the press! Power corrupts and Rupert Murdoch has had too much power. We see how it has corrupted him, the media, and the British police! We need to end that process by contrivance within the law before it is too late.
We should not mistake that the next decade are defining years for British democracy. We need to get it right and provide for higher ethical standards.
One way is to stop advertising in Murdoch controlled media!
The new subversive army of the modern age is made up of private spies than are paid by unscrupulous individuals, such as Rupert Murdoch and Colonel Quadaffi, who see themselves as international forces for 'good' as defined by their own ethical rules, but which are considered outside national laws!
Since at least 2000, the police were supposed to enforce the law on the phone hackings, but we find they were controlled by agents of media and international moneyed interests.
We are still seeing only the scum on the surface because we don't have an independent media, but one controlled by corrupting international investors bent on taking away our long sought after freedoms and privileges.
We are affected by a monstrous lag between law enforcement and the committing of criminal acts.
There is not enough money in the coffers to enforce the law.
In such a situation, people need to look after their own interests.
Law and order has broken down because there is not enough money and influence to pay for it's enforcement! We are at the mercy of the profits made by unscrupulous media groups who seem determined to defy, change and break the law to their advantage.
People like Murdoch who have money define the law in such a way as to make more money and commit more acts of defiance against the law.
They even avoid taxation the only way law can be legal enforced!
We are thus left in a bind of having a permanent breaking of the law as an institution controlled by Rupert Murdoch and profitable media enterprise!???????
Behind Rupert's throne: The story of Rebekah Brooks - Press, Media - The Independent
We the public will not buy your goods and services and will have long memories that you supported Rupert's influence on Britain!
Phone Hacking Scandal Stirs Outrage in British Parliament and the British Public .. Enough is enough!
Now we see it for what it is... Profiteering by unethical newspapers destroys our trust. We saw this in banking and now in the media!
Some of us are beyond anger!
We have long had our suspicions that Rupert Murdoch's interests did not coincide with those of a democracy. We realized increasingly how much our publishing industry had changed because of our inability to control excesses in the media and through the media to all institutions we rely on for security and moral social behavior.
We feel betrayed by Murdoch and his corrosive agents. We want action to close his influence down.
We are really upset that any one could promote unethical behavior for profit. We want Murdoch's influence minimized!
We saw the role of Murdoch's immoral media empire to erode our best values taking them to the gutter. We are saddened by what has happened and horrified that it could continue. We will not tolerate corruption.
We propose a boycott against agents of such low dealing and unethical behavior.
We also saw moral corruption spread via the unethical media throughout parliament, throughout the banking industry, and throughout political processes.
We now know that the framework of our democracy is based on morality and ethics. We realize that our media need to be ethical and that the Murdoch business model works against this!
We realize that Murdoch's business model is increasing in conflict with our democratic ideals. We see increasingly a deficit in ethics emanating from the press where everything goes.
We realize that this is due to Murdoch's business model which is corrosive to ethics and which spreads the behavioral disease of unethical behavior throughout the publications world into all media and into our police force.
We learn that Murdoch's influence is like a contagious flu that sickens our society and reduces the works we see and hear in our media to the lowest of human experience.
We speculate on how far this process will destroy our willingness to live together as a happy community. One rotten apple, that of Murdoch's media world has rotted our media world!
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/07/world/europe/07britain.html?_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha2
Maid's lawyer tells New York district attorney to quit DSK Strauss-Kahn case | World news | The Guardian
Surprise....not!
We have long had our doubts because the case was always too easy and rape just seemed so very unlikely in the circumstances despite the history of womanizing of DSK!
We learned hat the woman is not a saint as portrayed earlier. We learn that money was to be gained by fraud and misrepresentation.
We learn of criminal involvement, and we wonder more and more about the naughty if the New York prosecutor's Office. We learn of the prosecutor's political ambitions.
More and more, we lose confidence in the legal process and more and more we feel sorry for DSK.
We wonder who was pulling hidden strings and whether therecwas a hidden political agenda originating from France.
We see French political interests too focussed on destroying the career of DSK, and we learn of the dangerous political processes evident in France that we anticipate leaked over into the US legal process.
We see the prosecutor's office as a victim of political intrigue emanating from Guinea and France.
These learnings are not easily removed now the cat is out of the bag! DSK has suffered enough....from this nonsense!