data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f498/8f4989a8370a1a1b2f5dcf6a52d94cc8efdd4fdf" alt=""
In Europe, the authorities straighten out many meandering rivers because of many reasons, but in the end the river ran to fast and the volumes of water became destructive when there was not sufficient space and time. Enormous flooding occurred.
We think governments should move quickly on certain policy changes, go directly to the solution. What we forget is that meandering to the solution may ensure the solution is attained without damaging the complete system. For example, the American wanted everyone to own their home, so the money supply was enlarged and interest rates lowered. This was done so rapidly that house price inflation resulted and a house price bubble occurred. Prices fell and people walked away from their homes. No deposit meant no commitment. Had the policy been more meandering and people asked to make deposits and to lock into commitments, the credit crisis would not have occurred and we might be looking at the re-election of a Republican president. If the democrats move to quickly they might just lose the election because people see such rapid ill thought out policy activity as the cause of their grief.