Saying something does not mean its true or nothing should be done. Why is proof needed anyways? There is no convincing evidence that the Maldives will be flooded over by the end of the century, but perhaps action should taken on the possibility. Similarly, no one has proof any particular individual will die of cancer from a cell tower, but there is a possibility that many unknown people will die prematurely near cell towers and that proximity will be implicated. It is sometimes very unwise not to act on a possibility. Once it is probable, that's too too late.
"If you have watered your best ideas, stand way way back?" Wooh
Arthur
Such as:
"One of the advantages of being disorganized is that one is always having surprising discoveries."
― A.A. Milne
