Interest human social defence mechanisms are at play again. EMF radiation directly affecting DNA or indirectly? Most arguments saying safety is of no concern speak of weak direct effects rather than indirect. US military says their soldiers are robust. Even direct effects are described in partial terms. People decide for themselves on the basis of what they see and the statements of selected government agencies whether or not EMF radiation is damaging rather than look seriously at the studies that show there are serious neurological communications and other albumen issues such as penetration of brain blood barrier to consider. Hey, we are so complacent!
http://www.ncadvertiser.com/26152/are-cell-towers-dangerous-more-objections-to-latest-town-proposal/
