Cheap and Awful Wireless! Is Grand Bend being denied the better fiber optic service by Bell and Rogers?

"Wireless is really cheap and awful technology, but consumers don't find it cheap because of monopolistic pricing?"

The technology companies supplying broadband to rural and remote areas need to go to fibre optic to ensure quality.

http://nbnmyths.wordpress.com/why-not-wireless/

http://cloutnow.org/fiberoptic/

http://apcmag.com/wireless-vs-fibre-debate-no-contest-says-user-.htm

http://sagarsharam89.hubpages.com/hub/Optical-fiber-cable-vs-wireless-communication

Actually, in the following article there is a footnote saying Fibre is faster!

http://www.technologyreview.com/news/405372/faster-than-fiber/

http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/09/hosing-down-the-hype-on-wireless-internet-technology/

http://searchmobilecomputing.techtarget.com/definition/optical-wireless

http://www.openforum.com.au/content/optical-fiber-or-wireless

http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/44212.html

It would appear that no one even considers the health risks of wireless. Add these health risks and it makes sense to go fibre optics if you can afford it?


Join the many thousands by being better informed through reading daily news and journal articles to be discovered at http://woohs.blogspot.com .... Enjoy a series of regular sketches and photos by Woohs' ... RT and share a relatively safe way to sample critical and thought provoking writing about what's happening .... worldwide. Prepare to think differently about your world.