Great idea!
Scratches to Sketches
Saturday, 18 May 2013
Renewable energy map: Wind, solar, hydroelectric power use by state. - Slate Magazine
Hydro, wave, current, wind, solar? It all adds up to a relatively cleaner earth despite the global warming polluters! What sort of energy future are you supporting?
Do you even care?
Experts for solid measures to meet energy needs
While Saudi Arabia thinks solar, Pakistan is in dark dreary bottom of the pit technologies?
Solar oriented US installs 845MW in Q2 2013 - PV-Tech
One quarter a Niagara Falls capacity cannot be bad for the environment. Keep it up America?
Empower Energies installs four PV arrays for General Motors - PV-Tech
Where is the infra structure for Lambton Shores electric charging stations going to be? What are the issues? Any new by laws, opportunities for development?
Mountain of Petroleum Coke From Oil Sands Rises in Detroit - NYTimes.com
And, what happens to it? What about secondary waste effects?
White House Sharpens Focus on Path Forward After Troubles - NYTimes.com
Let's together build a fair just pluralistic clean sunshine world?
De-Stress Kit for the Changing Times, Doc Childre, Institute of HeartMath
Don't forget the vitamin d, sunshine, and green tea!
Pain Fighting Foods - Superfoods that Fight Inflammation and Pain - Woman's Day
Green tea, salmon, cherries, olive oil, and ....?
Utilities Commission on cell towers: ‘We won’t be held hostage’ | NCAdvertiser.com
By all means put the polluting cell towers down instead of fiber optics which is potentially 50,000 times faster and massively more reliable, then distribute a fair weighted rental to those residing near the towers based on closeness.
About 15 percent of profits or net revenues would not seem unreasonable based on some standardisation based on tower height and strength.
Then insure the locals for life against cancer and all the diseases known to arise from radiation and breach of the blood brain barrier.
Prohibit children from living close to the tower under ten years and pay compensation to would be
child adopters and parents!
Why read the silly article that follows?:
